Philosophy Lexicon of Arguments

Author Item Excerpt Meta data

Books on Amazon
Frank I 637
Incorrigibility / DavidsonVsRorty: our claims about our own propositional attitudes are not incorrigible - it is possible that our self-judgments be overturned by clues and evidence that are available to others -
I 644
I. / Shoemaker: not a kind of knowledge, but a class of utterances (not propositions as meanings) - DavidsonVs: that is not enough: the speaker must know that it is this particular class of sentences he used - problem: if only the speaker himself can decide that, then there is absolutely no basis.

D. Davidson
Der Mythos des Subjektiven Stuttgart 1993

D. Davidson
Handlung und Ereignis Frankfurt 1990

D. Davidson
Wahrheit und Interpretation Frankfurt 1990

Fra I
M. Frank (Hrsg.)
Analytische Theorien des Selbstbewusstseins Frankfurt 1994

> Counter arguments against Davidson
> Counter arguments in relation to Incorrigibility

> Suggest your own contribution | > Suggest a correction | > Export as BibTeX Datei
Ed. Martin Schulz, access date 2017-05-25