Philosophy Lexicon of Arguments
| |||
|
| |||
| Intentionality: intentionality is the ability of people and higher animals to relate to and react to circumstances such as things and states. Concepts, words, and sentences also refer to something but have no intentionality. This linguistic relating-to is called reference instead._____________Annotation: The above characterizations of concepts are neither definitions nor exhausting presentations of problems related to them. Instead, they are intended to give a short introduction to the contributions below. – Lexicon of Arguments. | |||
| Author | Item | Summary | Meta data |
|---|---|---|---|
| I 15 Chisholm thesis: primacy of intentionality before language. - - - Chisholm II M.David/L. Stubenberg (Hg) Philosophische Aufsätze zu Ehren von R.M. Chisholm Graz 1986 II 115 Intentionality / Brandl: that does not explain the attributive use ("Whoever it is") - instead use is explained by our knowledge of the language, therefore the primacy of intentionality is questionable. II 218 Primacy of the intentional / Chisholm: to understand the reference of language by the reference of thinking - Wittgenstein: Vs, but not unique. - II 219 linguistic turn: only shifts the problem - intentionality / Wittgenstein: W. has such aspects in his thinking, too._____________Explanation of symbols: Roman numerals indicate the source, arabic numerals indicate the page number. The corresponding books are indicated on the right hand side. ((s)…): Comment by the sender of the contribution. |
Chi I R. Chisholm Die erste Person Frankfurt 1992 Chi III Roderick M. Chisholm Erkenntnistheorie Graz 2004 |
||
> Counter arguments against Chisholm
> Counter arguments in relation to Intentionality
> Export as BibTeX Datei
Ed. Martin Schulz, access date 2018-06-25