## Philosophy Lexicon of Arguments | |||

| |||

Author | Item | Summary | Meta data |
---|---|---|---|

I 91 E.g. the sequence of the prime numbers is a sequence without a formula, but not without a law! The law is, of course, to be expressed only by language, no formula is known. Nevertheless, there is a clear rule for the formation of the sequence! Additional difficulty: if we demand a law for the formation of consequences, this would be a strict demand, but only if we had a strict concept of the law! E.g. we can define a sequence for x n + y n = z n: t n should be 1, if three integers can be found, it is insoluble for integers, if t n = 0. The sequence would then begin like this: 1,1,0,0,0,... and no one can say to-day whether the two first ones are followed by zeros or not. --- I 92 Is this provision a law now? Or does it make a law when Fermat's assumption is proved? _____________ Explanation of symbols: Roman numerals indicate the source, arabic numerals indicate the page number. The corresponding books are indicated on the right hand side. ((s)…): Comment by the sender of the contribution. |
Wa I F. Waismann Einführung in das mathematische Denken Darmstadt 1996 Wa II F. Waismann Logik, Sprache, Philosophie Stuttgart 1976 |

> Export as BibTeX Datei

Ed. Martin Schulz, access date 2018-06-22