Philosophy Lexicon of Arguments

Search  
 
Author Item Excerpt Meta data

 
Books on Amazon
I 91
E.g. the sequence of the prime numbers is a sequence without a formula, but not without a law! The law is, of course, to be expressed only by language, no formula is known. Nevertheless, there is a clear rule for the formation of the sequence!

Additional difficulty: if we demand a law for the formation of consequences, this would be a strict demand, but only if we had a strict concept of the law!
E.g. we can define a sequence for x n + y n = z n: t n should be 1, if three integers can be found, it is insoluble for integers, if t n = 0. The sequence would then begin like this:

1,1,0,0,0,...

and no one can say to-day whether the two first ones are followed by zeros or not.
---
I 92
Is this provision a law now? Or does it make a law when Fermat's assumption is proved?


_____________
Explanation of symbols: Roman numerals indicate the source, arabic numerals indicate the page number. The corresponding books are indicated on the right hand side. ((s)…): Comment by the sender of the contribution.

Wa I
F. Waismann
Einführung in das mathematische Denken Darmstadt 1996

Wa II
F. Waismann
Logik, Sprache, Philosophie Stuttgart 1976


> Counter arguments against Waismann
> Counter arguments in relation to Laws



> Suggest your own contribution | > Suggest a correction | > Export as BibTeX Datei
 
Ed. Martin Schulz, access date 2017-07-21