Philosophy Lexicon of Arguments

Search  
 
Holism: Holism is the assumption that the elements or the subject domain of a theory are accessible only with simultaneous availability of all elements or objects of this domain. It is also assumed that a change to an element does not exclude changes to all other elements at least. The statement "everything is connected with everything" is however a wrong characterization of the holism, since it is logically erroneous.
 
Author Item Excerpt Meta data

 
Books on Amazon:
Michael Devitt
Fodor I 131
Holism/Devitt: irreducible functional and therefore perhaps holistic concepts are common in nonintentional sciences.
Question/Devitt: why should psychologists be concerned when belief turns out to be holistic?
Fodor/Lepore: Answer: one can have a functionalism of X without having a definition of X! For example, one can have a metaphysical doctrine about the supervenience base of X.

Devi I
M. Devitt
Realism and Truth Princeton 1996

F/L
J. Fodor/E. Lepore
Holism Cambridge USA Oxford UK 1992


> Counter arguments against Devitt
> Counter arguments in relation to Holism



> Suggest your own contribution | > Suggest a correction | > Export as BibTeX Datei
 
Ed. Martin Schulz, access date 2017-05-27