Philosophy Lexicon of Arguments

Consistency, philosophy, logic: The expression of consistency is applied to systems or sets of statements. From a contradictory system any statement can be derived (see ex falso quodlibet). Therefore, contradictory systems are basically useless. It is characteristic of a consistent system that not every statement can be proved within it. See also systems, provability, proofs, calculus, consistency, theories, completeness, validity, expressiveness. Within a system, consistency may be demonstrated, but not beyond the boundaries of this system, since the use of the symbols and the set of possible objects are only defined for this system. Within mathematics, and only there applies that the mathematical objects, which are mentioned in consistent formulas, exist (Hilbert, Über das Unendliche, 1926). See also falsification, verification, existence, well-formed.

_____________
Annotation: The above characterizations of concepts are neither definitions nor exhausting presentations of problems related to them. Instead, they are intended to give a short introduction to the contributions below. – Lexicon of Arguments.

Author Item Excerpt Meta data

Books on Amazon
I 96
Def Strong Consistency/Strong consistent/Field: a mathematical theory M is st. c. , if it causes that the conjunction with a consistent non-mathematical theory T is still consistent. - T + M = consistent - Punch line: although st.c. does not follow from truth, it follows from necessary truth. - st.c. is however weaker than necessary truth because st.c. theories need not be true. - Purely mathematical theories (without math. entities): for them consistency involves strong consistency. - Non-pure: E.g. set theory with basic elements. - Urelement: Element of the lowest level, e.g. real numbers.
I 240
Consistency/Consistent/Mathematics/FieldVs: is untenable as a condition for the quality of mathematics: a consistent mathematical theory can be largely inadequate - Consistent (without contradiction) here means semantically consistent, i.e. satisfiable.

_____________
Explanation of symbols: Roman numerals indicate the source, arabic numerals indicate the page number. The corresponding books are indicated on the right hand side. ((s)…): Comment by the sender of the contribution.

Fie I
H. Field
Realism, Mathematics and Modality Oxford New York 1989

Fie II
H. Field
Truth and the Absence of Fact Oxford New York 2001

Fie III
H. Field
Science without numbers Princeton New Jersey 1980

> Counter arguments against Field
> Counter arguments in relation to Consistency ...

> Suggest your own contribution | > Suggest a correction | > Export as BibTeX Datei

Ed. Martin Schulz, access date 2017-09-22