Philosophy Lexicon of Arguments

Author Item Excerpt Meta data

Books on Amazon
III 155
Necessity/Causation/Armstrong: 1) irreflexive: Nothing causes itself, relative to itself no relation - 2) nontransitive: cause is not transmitted, but a new universal, even probability = 1, requires new law - 3) allows no contra-position (reversal), the effect cannot be the cause of the cause - 4) not symmetric, special case: causes in chain, but not reverse causality, merely necessary "precondition"
Chain of causes not reverse causality, only: each state has a necessary condition - Conditions do not cause! - Analogy: Laws of nature do not order anything - therefore causal laws only a subclass of laws of nature.
II 168
Constitution is not causation - (> part/whole) -

Explanation of symbols: Roman numerals indicate the source, arabic numerals indicate the page number. The corresponding books are indicated on the right hand side. ((s)…): Comment by the sender of the contribution.

AR II = Disp
D. M. Armstrong

Dispositions, Tim Crane, London New York 1996

D. Armstrong
What is a Law of Nature? Cambridge 1983

> Counter arguments against Armstrong

> Suggest your own contribution | > Suggest a correction | > Export as BibTeX Datei
Ed. Martin Schulz, access date 2017-06-29