Philosophy Lexicon of Arguments

Author Item Excerpt Meta data

Books on Amazon
I 431
Conditional: E.g. if it is true that p, it is true that q, is claiming no truth.
II 84
Conditional/Brandom: for Frege the most important - without it, you can do something only by agreeing or rejecting - with the conditional you can say something: namely that one approves an inference.

Bra I
R. Brandom
Expressive Vernunft Frankfurt 2000

Bra II
R. Brandom
Begr√ľnden und Begreifen Frankfurt 2001

> Counter arguments against Brandom
> Counter arguments in relation to Conditional

> Suggest your own contribution | > Suggest a correction | > Export as BibTeX Datei
Ed. Martin Schulz, access date 2017-05-25