|Deduction: necessary conclusion from the given premises. From the general to the particular. - In contrast, induction from special cases to the general._____________Annotation: The above characterizations of concepts are neither definitions nor exhausting presentations of problems related to them. Instead, they are intended to give a short introduction to the contributions below. – Lexicon of Arguments. |
Transcendental deduction/Kant: transcendental deduction is the claim of the mind to remain pure and unsensual in spite of sensory perception- not in mere concepts but in perception regarding how to represent its judgments, there is this claim - the transcendental is a replacement for the theoretically impossible metaphysical transition into the supernatural realm of purpose.
Bubner I 109
Transcendental Deduction/Kant/Bubner: whoever wants to save them cannot escape into aesthetics. Kant follows here the synthesis in all consistency all the way back to the origin (from jurisprudence):
Complete derivation of legal claims by tracing back legitimation titles.
Deduction/Kant/Bubner: therefore deduction does not mean the compelling development of sentences from sentences, according to the syllogistic model, as many interpreters have believed._____________Explanation of symbols: Roman numerals indicate the source, arabic numerals indicate the page number. The corresponding books are indicated on the right hand side. ((s)…): Comment by the sender of the contribution.
I Günter Schulte Kant Einführung (Campus) Frankfurt 1994
Externe Quellen. ZEIT-Artikel 11/02 (Ludger Heidbrink über Rawls)
Volker Gerhard "Die Frucht der Freiheit" Plädoyer für die Stammzellforschung ZEIT 27.11.03
Antike Themen und ihre moderne Verwandlung Frankfurt 1992