Philosophy Lexicon of Arguments

Search  
 
Analysis: examining a subject by breaking it down into its components.

_____________
Annotation: The above characterizations of concepts are neither definitions nor exhausting presentations of problems related to them. Instead, they are intended to give a short introduction to the contributions below. – Lexicon of Arguments.
 
Author Item Excerpt Meta data

 
Books on Amazon
Wolf II 232
Analysis/Theory/Test/Kripke: When considering whether a given linguistic phenomenon in English is a counterexample to an analysis, one should consider a hypothetical language that resembles English, except that here the analysis is set to be correct - if now the phenomenon in question occurs in the corresponding (hypothetical) community, the fact that it occurs in English cannot refute the hypothesis that the analysis is correct for English.


_____________
Explanation of symbols: Roman numerals indicate the source, arabic numerals indicate the page number. The corresponding books are indicated on the right hand side. ((s)…): Comment by the sender of the contribution.

K I
S.A. Kripke
Name und Notwendigkeit Frankfurt 1981

K III
S. A. Kripke
Outline of a Theory of Truth (1975)
In
Recent Essays on Truth and the Liar Paradox, R. L. Martin (Hg), Oxford/NY 1984

K II siehe Wol I
U. Wolf (Hg)
Eigennamen Frankfurt 1993


> Counter arguments against Kripke



> Suggest your own contribution | > Suggest a correction | > Export as BibTeX Datei
 
Ed. Martin Schulz, access date 2017-06-28