Lexicon of Arguments

 Philosophical and Scientific Issues in Dispute
 
[german]


Complaints - Corrections

Table
Concepts
Versus
Sc. Camps
Theses I
Theses II

Concept/Author*  

What is wrong?
Page
Other metadata
Translation
Excerpt or content
Other

Correction: Year / Place / Page
/ /

Correction:
(max 500 charact.)

Your username*
or User-ID

Email address*

The complaint
will not be published.

 
Rorty VI 214
Deception/Davidson/Rorty: bring us through a causal process to represent true or false beliefs depending on the programming. >Beliefs/Davidson.
- - -
Davidson I 38
Error/Belief/Davidson: that I do not deceive myself in the majority of cases is essential for the fact that I have a language - that makes "inner objects" superfluous. >Objects of Belief.
Instead: history of language acquisition. >Language acquisition, >Causal theory of knowledge.
Truth conditions for the speaker: sentence is true when e.g. the Kohinoor is a crown jewel. - ((s) conditional: non-empirical - for the listener: empirical.)
---
Davidson I (e) 98
Third dogma/scheme/content/error/deception/Davidson: deception after abolition of the separation schema/content is no longer a problem, no question whether we are capable of the knowledge of the world and of the foreign-psychological - even more: how - but these are no longer epistemological questions, but rather questions about the nature of rationality. >Conceptual scheme.

Found an error? Use our Complaint Form. Perhaps someone forgot to close a bracket? A page number is wrong?
Help us to improve our lexicon.
However, if you are of a different opinion, as regards the validity of the argument, post your own argument beside the contested one.
The correction will be sent to the contributor of the original entry to get his opinion about.