Lexicon of Arguments

Philosophical and Scientific Issues in Dispute
 
[german]


Complaints - Corrections

Table
Concepts
Versus
Sc. Camps
Theses I
Theses II

Concept/Author*  

What is wrong?
Page
Other metadata
Translation
Excerpt or content
Other

Correction: Year / Place / Page
/ /

Correction:
(max 500 charact.)

Your username*
or User-ID

Email address*

The complaint
will not be published.

 
I 57
NagelVsprimacy of language: leads to the devaluation of reason, decay product of analytic philosophy.
>Linguistic turn, >Analytic philosophy.
Rejection of Frege. Thinking is often not linguistical. The most common forms of thinking do not depend on any single language.
>Thinking without language.
I 57
If language reveals principles of thought, this is not because logic is grammar, but because grammar follows a logic.
>Logic, >Grammar, >Thinking, >Thoughts.
I 61
That "and" has become the word for the conjunction by contingent circumstances has no concequences for the status of the true statement that p is implied by p and q. What a set of sentences means depends on conventions. What follows from a set of premises does not depend on them (formal).
- - -
Rorty VI 144 ff
NagelVsDennett/Rorty: his "hetero-phenomenology" is not sufficient.
>Heterophenomenology.
Nagel thesis: the sources of philosophy are preverbal, their problems are not dependent on culture.
Rorty VI 144 ff
NagelVsWittgenstein: (according to Rorty): the limits of language are not the limits of thinking! "The content of some thoughts goes beyond any form that they may take in human consciousness." (Per distinction scheme/content).
>Scheme/content.

Found an error? Use our Complaint Form. Perhaps someone forgot to close a bracket? A page number is wrong?
Help us to improve our lexicon.
However, if you are of a different opinion, as regards the validity of the argument, post your own argument beside the contested one.
The correction will be sent to the contributor of the original entry to get his opinion about.