Lexicon of Arguments

Philosophical and Scientific Issues in Dispute
 
[german]


Complaints - Corrections

Table
Concepts
Versus
Sc. Camps
Theses I
Theses II

Concept/Author*  

What is wrong?
Page
Other metadata
Translation
Excerpt or content
Other

Correction: Year / Place / Page
/ /

Correction:
(max 500 charact.)

Your username*
or User-ID

Email address*

The complaint
will not be published.

 
I 59
Rule/Wittgenstein/Brandom: application of a rule may prohibit or permit performance - the rule determines the accuracy only if it is applied correctly - therefore, it always takes more rules, down to the last, implicit rules.
Interpretation/Wittgenstein: Rules for the application of a rule. >Interpretation/Wittgenstein.
I 62
Background: practices. >Practise.
I 119
Wittgenstein: he uses "rule" in at least three different meanings:
1) Rule says explicitly what one must do.
2) Everything that guides the behavior of the person whose behavior is being judged, no matter if discursively or conceptually.
3) Sometimes just talks about following the rules when behavior is subject to normative judgment.
Game: the rule can be a substitute for teaching playfully. But also: a rule is used neither in the classroom nor in the game itself. >Language game.
I 120
Color charts and even signposts are expressions of a rule. >Colour.
There is no comprehension of a rule that is not an interpretation.
Brandom: no rule without asserting, judging and describing.
Make an announcement or giving orders is not rule-following. >Rule following.
I 820
Rules/Wittgenstein/Brandom: pro Wittgenstein: explicit norms are only intelligible against a background of implicit ones - Vs: nevertheless it is possible that interpretation is involved at every level.

Found an error? Use our Complaint Form. Perhaps someone forgot to close a bracket? A page number is wrong?
Help us to improve our lexicon.
However, if you are of a different opinion, as regards the validity of the argument, post your own argument beside the contested one.
The correction will be sent to the contributor of the original entry to get his opinion about.