Lexicon of Arguments

Philosophical and Scientific Issues in Dispute
 
[german]


Complaints - Corrections

Table
Concepts
Versus
Sc. Camps
Theses I
Theses II

Concept/Author*  

What is wrong?
Page
Other metadata
Translation
Excerpt or content
Other

Correction: Year / Place / Page
/ /

Correction:
(max 500 charact.)

Your username*
or User-ID

Email address*

The complaint
will not be published.

 
Rorty III 91
(according to Rorty):
Irrational/Davidson: "rational" should be used only in the sense of "coherent". Otherwise we would have to give up our most important values ​​as irrational! A theory that could not explain rationality would be one that could not explain our self-criticism.
>Coherence.
- - -
Avramides I 102f
Rationality/Davidson: that is what we need for understanding propositional attitudes, not for physics. Correspondingly:
- - -
Davidson I 98
Davidson: Questions such as whether we are capable of recognizing the world and the foreign psychic no longer pose a problem, but all the more so how we arrive at such knowledge. And which conditions a conviction must fulfil in order to be considered knowledge.
But these are no longer traditional epistemological questions, but questions about the nature of rationality. It is worth trying to answer them.
>World, >Reality, >Cognition, >Knowledge, >Epistemology.

Found an error? Use our Complaint Form. Perhaps someone forgot to close a bracket? A page number is wrong?
Help us to improve our lexicon.
However, if you are of a different opinion, as regards the validity of the argument, post your own argument beside the contested one.
The correction will be sent to the contributor of the original entry to get his opinion about.