Lexicon of Arguments

Philosophical and Scientific Issues in Dispute
 
[german]


Complaints - Corrections

Table
Concepts
Versus
Sc. Camps
Theses I
Theses II

Concept/Author*  

What is wrong?
Page
Other metadata
Translation
Excerpt or content
Other

Correction: Year / Place / Page
/ /

Correction:
(max 500 charact.)

Your username*
or User-ID

Email address*

The complaint
will not be published.

 
I 87
Nominalism/Meixner: the thesis that all entities are individuals.
I 88
These words must then be concrete sound events or concrete inscriptions for the nominalist. The word "word" in turn must not denote a type object (also called "ontological individualism").
Radical nominalism/Meixner: Thesis: That all entities are actual individuals.
Most radical nominalism/Meixner: Thesis: All entities are actual physical individuals.
Materialism/Meixner: Materialism would like to represent the most radical nominalism, but it turns out that only a restricted nominalism can be represented.
Reconstructive nominalism: thesis: all entities are individuals and the basic individuals (BI) are physical, but at the same time:
1. most individuals (including BI) are non-actual
2. all sets over BI are also individuals (honorific "physical").
Then universals can be regarded as individual-like entities.
a) Variant of Carnap: basic individuals taken as individuals.
b) David Lewis: BI on the contrary equated with maximally consistent individuals. (Sets of properties).
>Actualism, >Possibilism, >D. Lewis.
I 94
Nominalism: Thesis: There are no true-making entities.
>Universals, >Truthmakers.
Extreme nominalism: must change the language.
>Everyday language, >Ontology.

Found an error? Use our Complaint Form. Perhaps someone forgot to close a bracket? A page number is wrong?
Help us to improve our lexicon.
However, if you are of a different opinion, as regards the validity of the argument, post your own argument beside the contested one.
The correction will be sent to the contributor of the original entry to get his opinion about.