Lexicon of Arguments

Philosophical and Scientific Issues in Dispute
 
[german]


Complaints - Corrections

Table
Concepts
Versus
Sc. Camps
Theses I
Theses II

Concept/Author*  

What is wrong?
Page
Other metadata
Translation
Excerpt or content
Other

Correction: Year / Place / Page
/ /

Correction:
(max 500 charact.)

Your username*
or User-ID

Email address*

The complaint
will not be published.

 
IV 152 f
Causality/Strawson: because of different possible descriptions in reality dependent on generality.
Hume was right with that. - But it's also not a selection of individual descriptions.
>Generality, >Generalization, >Description, >Description dependence, >Context dependence, >Causal dependence, >Causal explanation.
IV 157
Causality/StrawsonVsHume: he overlooks the very obvious fact that objects exert physical force. (Dennett: and that is observable).
>Causality/Hume, >Causality/Dennett.
I 162
Pro Hume: you can observe many reactions without knowing what forces are at work.
IV 163
VsHume: regularity is time neutral, it could also be reversed. (s) because (type-type, not type-token).
>Regularity, >Regularity theory.
IV 165
VsHume: we learn the regularity, because we already have the concept of causality.
IV 172
Strawson: the utmost we can recognize are probability laws.
>Probability, >Probability laws.
Causality/Language: more in transitive verbs than in the word "cause".
IV 175
Common Causes: easily possible: E.g. malaria - cause: denotes relation that occurs in different modes of being

Found an error? Use our Complaint Form. Perhaps someone forgot to close a bracket? A page number is wrong?
Help us to improve our lexicon.
However, if you are of a different opinion, as regards the validity of the argument, post your own argument beside the contested one.
The correction will be sent to the contributor of the original entry to get his opinion about.