Lexicon of Arguments

Philosophical and Scientific Issues in Dispute
 
[german]


Complaints - Corrections

Table
Concepts
Versus
Sc. Camps
Theses I
Theses II

Concept/Author*  

What is wrong?
Page
Other metadata
Translation
Excerpt or content
Other

Correction: Year / Place / Page
/ /

Correction:
(max 500 charact.)

Your username*
or User-ID

Email address*

The complaint
will not be published.

 
I 124
Subjunction/Wessel .: ">": statement-forming operator, refers to states of affairs.
>Operators, >States of affairs.
Inference (= implication)/Wessel: 2-digit predicate, relates to linguistic structures.
((s) in "p>q" we do not conclude anything, but take note that a claim exists.
Consequence relationship/Wessel: = implication (no operator but predicate).
>paradoxes because content can be contradictory, even if the form is valid.
Conditional: (E.g. scientific statement) would be false for the same reason (because the content does not form a connection).
I 175
Formal implication/Russell/Principia Mathematica(1)/Wessel: "P (x)> x Q(x)": "for all x applies" corresponding "> a1a2a3..an" - binary quantifiers.
>Quantifiers, >Quantification.
I 297
Conditional/Wessel: subjunction follows from conditional statement - ((s) but not vice versa.)
>Conditional.

1. Whitehead, A.N. and Russel, B. (1910). Principia Mathematica. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Found an error? Use our Complaint Form. Perhaps someone forgot to close a bracket? A page number is wrong?
Help us to improve our lexicon.
However, if you are of a different opinion, as regards the validity of the argument, post your own argument beside the contested one.
The correction will be sent to the contributor of the original entry to get his opinion about.