Lexicon of Arguments

 Philosophical and Scientific Issues in Dispute
 
[german]


Complaints - Corrections

Table
Concepts
Versus
Sc. Camps
Theses I
Theses II

Concept/Author*  

What is wrong?
Page
Other metadata
Translation
Excerpt or content
Other

Correction: Year / Place / Page
/ /

Correction:
(max 500 charact.)

Your username*
or User-ID

Email address*

The complaint
will not be published.

 
III 58
Law/Fodor: "lawlike" for him is a basic concept and not a property of sentences, but the relationship between universals. Therefore, terms are not themselves intentional.
Cf. >Intentionality/Fodor.
PutnamVsFodor: they are intentional! Fodor fails with extensions of analytical (scientific) definitions with necessary and sufficient conditions for cats.
Fodor: cats trigger single tokens of "cat".
III 60
E.g. "super billionaire"/Putnam: for the triggering of characters the meaning of the word is crucial. The word is already interpreted.
>Interpretation, >Words, cf. >Word meaning.

Found an error? Use our Complaint Form. Perhaps someone forgot to close a bracket? A page number is wrong?
Help us to improve our lexicon.
However, if you are of a different opinion, as regards the validity of the argument, post your own argument beside the contested one.
The correction will be sent to the contributor of the original entry to get his opinion about.