Lexicon of Arguments

Philosophical and Scientific Issues in Dispute
 
[german]


Complaints - Corrections

Table
Concepts
Versus
Sc. Camps
Theses I
Theses II

Concept/Author*  

What is wrong?
Page
Other metadata
Translation
Excerpt or content
Other

Correction: Year / Place / Page
/ /

Correction:
(max 500 charact.)

Your username*
or User-ID

Email address*

The complaint
will not be published.

 
I 15
Definition/Frege: you cannot define: "The number one is a thing" because there is a definite on the one side of the equation and an indefinite article on the other.
>Equations, >Articles, >Definability.
I 78
Definition/Frege: specifying a mode of operation is not a definition.
I 99
Definition/Object/Introduction/Frege: the way in which an object was introduced is not a property of the object. >Introduction.
The definition of an object only specifies the use of a sign, it says nothing about the object. ((s) Here: introduction of an object in the speech = definition)
Introduction/Frege: after the introduction, the definition turns into a judgment about the object.
I 130
FregeVsFormalism: formalism only gives instructions for definitions, not definitions as such. >Formalism.
I 131
E.g. Number i/Frege: you have to re-explain the meaning of "sum".
FregeVsFormalism/FregeVsHilbert: it is not enough to demand only one meaning. >Foundation.
- - -
IV 100ff
Definition/Object/Frege: the definite article must be on both sides here. Defining an object only specifying the use of a sign. More interesting are definitions of properties.
IV 100ff
Indefinable/Frege: truth and identity are indefinable as simple basic concepts. Other AuthorsVs. > truth theories, > theories of meaning.
>Truth theories, >Meaning theories.

Found an error? Use our Complaint Form. Perhaps someone forgot to close a bracket? A page number is wrong?
Help us to improve our lexicon.
However, if you are of a different opinion, as regards the validity of the argument, post your own argument beside the contested one.
The correction will be sent to the contributor of the original entry to get his opinion about.