Lexicon of Arguments


Philosophical and Scientific Issues in Dispute
 
[german]

Screenshot Tabelle Begriffes Help us establish new Lexicons of Arguments
Psychology - Economics
History - Politics
Law - Social Sciences
Art Theory - Others

 

Find counter arguments by entering NameVs… or …VsName.

Enhanced Search:
Search term 1: Author or Term Search term 2: Author or Term


together with


The author or concept searched is found in the following 10 entries.
Disputed term/author/ism Author
Entry
Reference
Appearance Parmenides
 
Books on Amazon
Bubner I 51
Appearance/being/PlatoVsParmenides: new: linguisticality of the term - Only in the language is the concept of being able to express what it means. Also: the concept of being is only useful in testimonies.

Appearance Plato
 
Books on Amazon
Bubner I 50
Appearance/Plato: must be understood as the being of nothingness. Thus further problematizations are necessary in order to put the initial question in further dimensions. This makes the conflict with Parmenides inevitable:
---
I 51
Being/Parmenides: had forbidden to attribute a being to non-being. Being/Appearance/PlatoVsParmenides: the solution of the problem of being has to be re-established, in memory of the linguistic nature of the concept.
Only in language can the concept of being express what it means, and also the concept of being is only meaningful in propositions.
---
Bubner I, 97
Appearance/Plato/Bubner: is due to the peculiar structure of the speech to be able to link intolerable elements in the sentence together. ((s) thesis, Plato's criticism of the appearance appears to be a coherence theory rather than a correspondence theory.)
---
I 98
Sophistes/Plato: It is not a step into the empiricism. Instead, one can see from the connection of the elements "Theaitetos sits" and "Theaitetos flies" that "man" and "sit", but not "man" and "fly" match. The respective "eidos" is to be examined in the logos analysis to see if they can co-exist.

Common Sense Nietzsche
 
Books on Amazon
Danto III 95
Common Sense/Nietzsche/Danto: for Nietzsche, the common sense itself is an interpretation and nothing that is opposed to interpretations. The common sense is metaphysics that has become everyday for him, (...) a fantasy of error and misbelief, (...) without the slightest concordance with reality. But: ---
Danto III 96
NietzscheVsParmenides/NietzscheVsPlato/Danto: Truth is the kind of error without which a certain kind of living being could not live. (F. Nietzsche: Nachlass, Berlin, 1999, p. 844). In the interests of life, we are forced to approve the common sense as set of beliefs and to reject all that is at odds with it.

Nie I
Friedrich Nietzsche
Sämtliche Werke: Kritische Studienausgabe Berlin 2009

Nie V
F. Nietzsche
Beyond Good and Evil 2014


Dt I
A. C. Danto
Wege zur Welt München 1999

Dt III
Arthur C. Danto
Nietzsche als Philosoph München 1998

Dt VII
A. C. Danto
The Philosophical Disenfranchisement of Art (Columbia Classics in Philosophy) New York 2005
Designation Geach
 
Books on Amazon
I 52
Naming/Denotation/Two-Name Theory/ZNT/GeachVsAristoteles: Incorrect approximation of predication and naming: as if predicates were (complex) names : "on the mat" - E.g. ((s) "The man stabbing Caesar to death stabbed the one stabbed by Brutus.") Additionally, Geach would use a link - Two-name theory: "Socrates is a philosopher" should be true because the thing is named - Vs: "Philosopher" (general term) is not a name for "all (or every) philosopher". ---
I 153f
Intentionality/naming/Parmenides/Geach: one cannot name anything that does not exist. (Geach pro) - ((s) existence introduction is not arbitrary, not without premise) - E.g. Geach dreamed of a girl and wants to call it "Pauline" - on the other hand, acquaintance is sufficient - present is not necessary. - Problem: is the girl even more imaginary, if he has not dreamed of her? - Geach: that is a sure sign that this is all nonsense. - Geach with Parmenides: "There is only that what exists." - GeachVsParmenides: However, one can talk about non-existent objects. - E.g. talking about absent friends without knowing that he is dead, changes the truth value, but not the fact that these are sentences. - Imaginary girls are not competing for identification in the dream. - If it is true of no identifiable girl that I dreamed of her, then I have not dreamed of any girl. - Solution: "I dreamed of a girl, but it is not true of a certain girl that I dreamed of her" - Similar to: it is not true of a certain stamp that I want it. ---
I 252
Predication/Geach: can be done without naming: in an if-that-sentence or in an or-sentence, a term P can be predicated of a thing without naming the thing "P". - E.g.: "If that what the policeman said is true, then he drove faster than 60". This does not call the policeman's sentence true. - (> Conditional) - predication/naming: centuries-old error: that the predicate is uttered by the thing. - Frege: Difference assertion/Predication: to name a thing "P", a sentence must be asserted! But a property is also predicted in a non-assertive sub-clause (subset). - Therefore, naming by predication must be explained, not vice versa.

Gea I
P.T. Geach
Logic Matters Oxford 1972

Existence Parmenides
 
Books on Amazon
Taureck I 16
Existence/Being/Parmenides (Eleat)/Taureck: Thesis: There cannot be a "nothing" because it is not conceivable for us. - GorgiasVsParmenides. ---
Taureck I 85
Existence/Parmenides: Thesis: only beings can exist and be thought. Gorgias: ad 1. ("It is nothing"): "If, namely, the non-being is non-being, both the non-being is non-being and the being is being, so that nothing more is there than the things."
Taureck: If one says of non-being, that it is non-being, then non-being belongs to the realm of beings!
"Nothing is" can also mean that neither is non-being, nor being. But why is it to be conceded that non-being is? ("Is" must be understood here as "means").
---
I 87
Existence/existence predicate/VsParmenides/Taureck: even today we still perceive this error in him: he confuses the concept of existence with a predicate (existence as a property). Gorgias could have recognized this, but the tradition does not allow that.
In addition, Gorgias would repeat the mistake inversely.


Tau I
B. H.F. Taureck
Die Sophisten Hamburg 1995
Existence Gorgias
 
Books on Amazon
Taureck I 85
Existence/Gorgias/Sophist/Taureck: Thesis: "It is nothing". (There are not even fragments of Gorgias handed down). According to Sextus Empiricus, Gorgias wants three things:
1. It is nothing.
2. If there is something, it is not recognizable. 3. But if there is something and if it is also recognizable, it is not to be made clear to others.
(GorgiasVsParmenides).
---
I 85
Existence/Parmenides: Thesis: only beings can exist and be thought. Gorgias: ad 1. ("There is nothing"): "If the non-existence is non-existence, both the non-being is non-existent, and the being is existend, so that nothing more is than the things."
Taureck: If one says of non-existence, that it is non-existence, then non-existence belongs to the realm of beings!
"Nothing is" can also mean that neither non-being nor being is. But why is it to be conceded that non-existence is? ("Is" must be understood here as "means").
---
I 87
Gorgias: ad 2. ("If there is something, it is not recognizable"): "If non-existence is, then existence is nothing but its opposite. ---
I 88
Therefore nothing should be, if it is not the same to be and not to be. Taureck: If there are only two mutually exclusive ways, the affirmation of non-existence would have to include the denial of existence.
Gorgias: ad 3. ("If, however, something is and if it is also recognizable, it is not to be made clear to others."): equates being and non-being: both, not the non-being and the being, for it is indeed the same as the non-being.
Taureck: here he has changed a premise: previously it applied: the non-existence has the property of existence. Now this is not the opposite.
---
I 89
Existence/Gorgias: from the argumentation of the becoming/un-becoming: Either a singular something has become or has not become. Now it can be shown that it is neither one nor the other, so it does not exist.
If something has not become, it is unlimited, but it cannot be anywhere. So it is not. (Here Gorgias refers to Zenon and Melissos).
---
91/92
Gorgias: ad 2. ("If there is something after all, it is not recognizable"): If the merely thought already refers to existent, then only the imagined would rotten on existence. From the point of view of the imagined, however, we know that it is not true. (No criteria for really existent). ---
I 93
Gorgias: ad 3. ("If, however, something is and is also recognizable, it is not to be made clear to others."): What one saw, how should one utter this through speech? How could this be clear to the listener, where he does not see it? Just as seeing does not recognize sounds, in the same way the hearing does not hear colors. ---
I 94
Taureck: Perceptions cannot represent each other. Logos is here only speech, no longer the described thing itself.
Gorgias, however, already knows the concept of the sign (semeio).


Tau I
B. H.F. Taureck
Die Sophisten Hamburg 1995
Existence Predicate Parmenides
 
Books on Amazon
Taureck I 87
Existence/existence predicate/VsParmenides/Taureck: even today we still perceive this error in him: he confuses the concept of existence with a predicate (existence as a property). Gorgias could have recognized this, but the tradition does not allow that.
In addition, Gorgias would repeat the mistake inversely.


Tau I
B. H.F. Taureck
Die Sophisten Hamburg 1995
Ideas Plato
 
Books on Amazon
Bubner I 27
Ideas/The Republic/Plato/Bubner: it is no accident that the theory of ideas is developed in The Republic: (> Philosophy king). Strange: that also the practical good should belong to the ideas.
---
I 28
Definition Ideas/Plato: The reasons of being of everything real. ---
I 51
Being/Parmenides: had forbidden to attribute a being to non-being. Being/Appearance/PlatoVsParmenides: the solution of the problem of being has to be re-established, in memory of the linguistic nature of the concept.
Only in language can the concept of being express what it means, and also the concept of being is only meaningful in propositions.
Ideas/Plato: now only one step is needed to introduce the community of ideas among themselves: the presocratic ontology provides, as a matter of course, the concepts of being, rest, and movement.
Each determination is now itself and not another. Thus, determinateness implies negation.
Here the dialectics finds its highest field of activity as the doctrine of the relations between one and many.

Reality Parmenides
 
Books on Amazon
Taureck I 110
Reality/Parmenides/Taureck: his provocation lies in the revaluation of the judgment according to which the human does not represent reality as it is, but deforms and distorts it. ProtagorasVsParmenides/Taureck: what is shown, exists as it appears. The human does not deform the world, but unlocks it knowingly.


Tau I
B. H.F. Taureck
Die Sophisten Hamburg 1995
Thinking Heidegger
 
Books on Amazon
Tugendhat II 47
Thinking/thought/Parmenides: thinking is perspective - such as hearing a sound or seeing a color. ---
Tugendhat II 57
HeideggerVsParmenides: thinking is not perspective. ---
Kardorff II 51
Thinking/Heidegger: Thinking is pointing: not uncovering, not wanting to make present. ---
Cardorff II 55
Thoughts/Heidegger/Cardorff: "We never come to a thought. They come to us." ---
II 56
Thought: Thinking is no means for knowing, thinking draws furrows into the field of being. "Thinking is not an understanding." Thinking is actually: leaving behind, taking into consideration. In thinking there is neither method nor theme, but: "The area ..."

Hei III
Martin Heidegger
Sein und Zeit Berlin 2006


Tu I
E. Tugendhat
Vorlesungen zur Einführung in die Sprachanalytische Philosophie Frankfurt 1976

Tu II
E. Tugendhat
Philosophische Aufsätze Frankfurt 1992

Hei II
Peter Cardorff
Martin Heidegger Frankfurt/M. 1991

The author or concept searched is found in the following 5 controversies.
Disputed term/author/ism Author Vs Author
Entry
Reference
Locke, J. Hume Vs Locke, J.
 
Books on Amazon
I 97
Mind/Hume: the mind is delirious! It is demented! Closed systems, synthesis and cosmologies are only imaginarily possible.
I 98
Here, principles are not exceeded subsequently, but in principle! Ancient philosophy: would have made use of the 'substance' to secure long-term survival, HumeVsSubstance.
modern philosophy: has its own phantoms: distinguishes primary and secondary qualities, which is no less crazy! HumeVsLocke.
I 105
HumeVsLocke: Perception allows us no distinctions between primary and secondary qualities. ((s) Because perceptions are individual.)
Quine I 235
 'Nothing' and 'nobody' is an indefinite singular term whose ambiguity has caused a lot of confusion.  HumeVsLocke: supposedly, he succumbed to the same confusion ('nobody overtook me') Locke: If a process had no cause, then it would have nothing as its cause, and nothing could not be a cause.
Quine: This is 'quite humorless' (also Heidegger, PlatonVsParmenides) of indeterminate singular term 'nothing' has the unfortunate tendency to pose as determinate singular term.
Cause: parallelism to 'everyone', which already reminds of the indeterminacy by sheer manifold, this reminder is absent in 'no'.

Stegmüller IV 347
Religion/Belief/Theology/HumeVsLocke: (Hume, Treatise, 10th Sect.): The Christian religion cannot be believed by any rational person without seeing in this belief itself a miracle. (Mackie pro).
Vollmer I 20
Hume: (An Enquiry Concerning Human Understanding, 1748) (Vollmer: much more astute than Locke). HumeVsLocke: innate ideas. In particular, the reasoning from experience, the inferring from the past to the future, is based on a habit that cannot be equated with rational deduction.
D. Hume
I Gilles Delueze David Hume, Frankfurt 1997 (Frankreich 1953,1988)
II Norbert Hoerster Hume: Existenz und Eigenschaften Gottes aus Speck(Hg) Grundprobleme der großen Philosophen der Neuzeit I Göttingen, 1997

Q I
W.V.O. Quine
Wort und Gegenstand Stuttgart 1980

Q II
W.V.O. Quine
Theorien und Dinge Frankfurt 1985

Q III
W.V.O. Quine
Grundzüge der Logik Frankfurt 1978

Q IX
W.V.O. Quine
Mengenlehre und ihre Logik Wiesbaden 1967

Q V
W.V.O. Quine
Die Wurzeln der Referenz Frankfurt 1989

Q VI
W.V.O. Quine
Unterwegs zur Wahrheit Paderborn 1995

Q VII
W.V.O. Quine
From a logical point of view Cambridge, Mass. 1953

Q VIII
W.V.O. Quine
Bezeichnung und Referenz
In
Zur Philosophie der idealen Sprache, J. Sinnreich (Hg), München 1982

Q X
W.V.O. Quine
Philosophie der Logik Bamberg 2005

Q XII
W.V.O. Quine
Ontologische Relativität Frankfurt 2003

Ca V
W. Stegmüller
Rudolf Carnap und der Wiener Kreis
In
Hauptströmungen der Gegenwartsphilosophie Bd I, , München 1987

St I
W. Stegmüller
Hauptströmungen der Gegenwartsphilosophie Bd I Stuttgart 1989

St II
W. Stegmüller
Hauptströmungen der Gegenwartsphilosophie Bd 2 Stuttgart 1987

St III
W. Stegmüller
Hauptströmungen der Gegenwartsphilosophie Bd 3 Stuttgart 1987

St IV
W. Stegmüller
Hauptströmungen der Gegenwartsphilosophie Bd 4 Stuttgart 1989

Vo I
G. Vollmer
Die Natur der Erkenntnis Bd I Stuttgart 1988

Vo II
G. Vollmer
Die Natur der Erkenntnis Bd II Stuttgart 1988
Parmenides Heidegger Vs Parmenides
 
Books on Amazon
Tugendhat II 57
Denken/HeideggerVsParmenides: Denken ist nicht Anschauung!

Hei III
Martin Heidegger
Sein und Zeit Berlin 2006

Tu I
E. Tugendhat
Vorlesungen zur Einführung in die Sprachanalytische Philosophie Frankfurt 1976

Tu II
E. Tugendhat
Philosophische Aufsätze Frankfurt 1992
Parmenides Plato Vs Parmenides
 
Books on Amazon
Bubner I 51
Being/Parmenides: had forbidden to concede being to the the nonexistence. Being/Appearing/PlatoVsParmenides: the solution of the problem of being must be newly approached, namely in memory of the linguistic nature of the concept. Only in language can the concept of being express what it means, and also the concept of being only occurs usefully in statements.
I 52
Being/Not-Being/Paradox/PlatoVsParmenides: Solution: the other is the form in which that which is not directly about itself has a mediated being. So it is the being of that which is not. So every logos speaks of something that it is not. The wrong speech can only deceive because speech and thing are not one.

Tugendhat II 43
Being/PlatoVsParmenides: (Theaithet): apart from the possibility of not thinking something, there is the possibility to think that something is not. "Not believing" does not mean "not saying" but "saying that not", "denying".

Bu I
R. Bubner
Antike Themen und ihre moderne Verwandlung Frankfurt 1992

Tu I
E. Tugendhat
Vorlesungen zur Einführung in die Sprachanalytische Philosophie Frankfurt 1976

Tu II
E. Tugendhat
Philosophische Aufsätze Frankfurt 1992
Parmenides Zeno Vs Parmenides
 
Books on Amazon
Bubner I 66
Eleatismus/Hegel: konzentriert sich auf Zenon (Schüler des Parmenides). Vorsokratiker: ihnen sei es vor allem um eine Bestimmung des Absoluten gegangen.
Absolutes/Ionier: natural aufgefasst, (Thales: Wasser ist das Prinzip aller Dinge).
Eleatismus: das Absolute ist die Form des reinen Gedankens.
Parmenides: Alleinheit des Seins
ZenonVsParmenides: durch die Paradoxien aufgelöst.
Parmenides Kanitscheider Vs Parmenides
 
Books on Amazon
Kanitscheider II 35
Welt/HeraklitVsParmenides: Frage: ist die Gesamtheit aller Dinge oder aller Ereignisse die Welt? Zeit/Kanitscheider: das läuft auf die Frage hinaus, ob die Zeitlichkeit eine innere Qualität der Welt ist.

Kan I
B. Kanitscheider
Kosmologie Stuttgart 1991

Kan II
B. Kanitscheider
Im Innern der Natur Darmstadt 1996

The author or concept searched is found in the following disputes of scientific camps.
Disputed term/author/ism Pro/Versus
Entry
Reference
Parmenides Versus Frank I 221
Nonexistence / Castaneda: the idea that what one thinks exists and that what does not exist has no properties, goes back to Parmenides.   Sophist / PlatonVsParmenides: Non-existent is feasible and can have properties.

Fra I
M. Frank (Hrsg.)
Analytische Theorien des Selbstbewusstseins Frankfurt 1994