Dictionary of Arguments


Philosophical and Scientific Issues in Dispute
 
[german]

Screenshot Tabelle Begriffes

 

Find counter arguments by entering NameVs… or …VsName.

Enhanced Search:
Search term 1: Author or Term Search term 2: Author or Term


together with


The author or concept searched is found in the following 1 entries.
Disputed term/author/ism Author
Entry
Reference
Hermeneutics Lacan Pagel I 50
LacanVsHermeneutics: Nothing behind it.


Lacan I
Gerda Pagel
Jacques Lacan zur Einführung Hamburg 1989

The author or concept searched is found in the following 4 controversies.
Disputed term/author/ism Author Vs Author
Entry
Reference
Gadamer, G. Foucault Vs Gadamer, G. Habermas I 293
FoucaultVsHermeneutics: It aims at appropriating sense. Detects in each document a silenced voice that needs to be radically called into question. The fictions of the "work", the "author" as the author of texts that manufacture "intellectual history causalities," these are all tools of an impermissible complexity reduction.   The archeology will transform the speaking documents back into silent monuments.

Foucault I
M. Foucault
Les mots et les choses: Une archéologie des sciences humaines , Paris 1966 - The Order of Things: An Archaeology of the Human Sciences, New York 1970
German Edition:
Die Ordnung der Dinge. Eine Archäologie der Humanwissenschaften Frankfurt/M. 1994

Foucault II
Michel Foucault
l’Archéologie du savoir, Paris 1969
German Edition:
Archäologie des Wissens Frankfurt/M. 1981

Ha I
J. Habermas
Der philosophische Diskurs der Moderne Frankfurt 1988

Ha III
Jürgen Habermas
Theorie des kommunikativen Handelns Bd. I Frankfurt/M. 1981

Ha IV
Jürgen Habermas
Theorie des kommunikativen Handelns Bd. II Frankfurt/M. 1981
Gadamer, G. Verschiedene Vs Gadamer, G. I 50
LacanVsHermeneutics: Nothing behind it.
A. Wellmer Die Sprache ist das Licht der Welt - Nachruf auf G. Gadamer, Die ZEIT März 2002

BenjaminVsGadamer: the "conversation that we are" is a discourse permeated by power relations and conflicts of interest, medium is not only a continuation of the tradition, but also an impending corruption of its best potentials. (>Adorno: "saving criticism").
WellmerVsGadamer: suspiciously military: "Engaging in the context of tradition". As a representative of an unbroken bourgeois educational elite, he had no sense for the corruptibility of the Enlightenment, except as a critic of modern scientism.




Hermeneutics Foucault Vs Hermeneutics Habermas I 325
FoucaultVsHermeneutics: self-reference is to be eliminated, the horizon is to be explained from basic practices. For example, the prohibition of gladiator battles is not to be traced back to the humanitarian influence of Christianity, but to be explained by the dissolution of one power information by the next.
I 326
HabermasVsFoucault: even the radical historian can only explain power technologies and dominance practices in comparison with one another and by no means each one as a totality from itself.

Foucault II
Michel Foucault
l’Archéologie du savoir, Paris 1969
German Edition:
Archäologie des Wissens Frankfurt/M. 1981

Ha I
J. Habermas
Der philosophische Diskurs der Moderne Frankfurt 1988

Ha IV
Jürgen Habermas
Theorie des kommunikativen Handelns Bd. II Frankfurt/M. 1981
Hermeneutics Luhmann Vs Hermeneutics Reese-Schäfer II 43
Hermeneutics/LuhmannVsHermeneutics: the experience and action itself produces the experience of senselessness. A concept of meaning, which is based on the classification into the context, obviously cannot function here.

AU I
N. Luhmann
Introduction to Systems Theory, Lectures Universität Bielefeld 1991/1992
German Edition:
Einführung in die Systemtheorie Heidelberg 1992

Lu I
N. Luhmann
Die Kunst der Gesellschaft Frankfurt 1997

Reese-Schäfer II
Walter Reese-Schäfer
Luhmann zur Einführung Hamburg 2001