Find counter arguments by entering NameVs… or …VsName.
The author or concept searched is found in the following 2 entries.
| Disputed term/author/ism | Author |
Entry |
Reference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Enlightenment | Herder | Gadamer I 204 Enlightenment/History/Herder/Gadamer: [the Historical School bases] its claim [on Herder] that not speculative philosophy but only historical research can lead to a universal historical view: HerderVsEnlightenment: Herder's attack against the rational pride of the Enlightenment had its sharpest weapon in the exemplary nature of classical antiquity, which Winckelmann in particular had proclaimed. Winckelmann: His "History of the Art of Antiquity" was unmistakably more than a historical account. It was a critique of the present and it was a programme. But by virtue of the ambiguity inherent in all critique of the present, the proclamation of the exemplary nature of Greek art, which was intended to establish a new ideal for its own present, nevertheless represents a genuine step towards historical knowledge. ((s) WinckelmannVsEnlightenment). Herder only needed to go a little beyond the foundation laid by Winckelmann and to recognize the dialectical relationship between exemplariness and unrepeatability in all the past in order to provide the teleological historical view of the Enlightenment with a universal historical world view. Thinking historically now means that each epoch has its own right to exist, indeed its own perfection. Herder has fundamentally taken this step. GadamerVsHerder: The historical view of the world could certainly not yet be fully developed as long as classical prejudices conceded classical antiquity an exemplary special position. Not only a teleology in the style of the rationalism of the Enlightenment, but also an inverted teleology, which reserves the perfect of a past or a beginning of history, still recognises a measure beyond history. >History/Gadamer, >History/Winckelmann, >History/Historism. |
Herder I Johann Gottfried Herder Herder: Philosophical Writings Cambridge 2002 Gadamer I Hans-Georg Gadamer Wahrheit und Methode. Grundzüge einer philosophischen Hermeneutik 7. durchgesehene Auflage Tübingen 1960/2010 Gadamer II H. G. Gadamer The Relevance of the Beautiful, London 1986 German Edition: Die Aktualität des Schönen: Kunst als Spiel, Symbol und Fest Stuttgart 1977 |
| Language | Heidegger | Figal I 123 Language/HeideggerVsHerder: There is no general language. >Language/Foucault, Language/Davidson. --- Cardorff II 29 Language/Translation/Heidegger/Cardorff: Heidegger is deliberately vague. Cardorff II 65 Language/Thinking/Heidegger/Cardorff: "Thinking accomplishes the relation of being to the essence of the human. It does not do and effect this reference. Thinking merely offers him what is given to himself by being, to being. In thinking, being is expressed. Language is the house of being." Language/Heidegger: In its essence neither expression nor an activity of human. The language speaks. >Thinking, >Thinking/Heidegger, >World/Thinking, >Thinking without language, >Language use, >Sein/Heidegger, >Language evolution. 1. M. Heidegger. Über den Humanismus. Frankfurt/M. 1943, S. 51. M. Heidegger. Über den Humanismus. Frankfurt/M. 1943, p. 5 |
Hei III Martin Heidegger Sein und Zeit Tübingen 1993 Figal I Günter Figal Martin Heidegger zur Einführung Hamburg 2016 Hei II Peter Cardorff Martin Heidegger Frankfurt/M. 1991 |
| |||
| Disputed term/author/ism | Author Vs Author |
Entry |
Reference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Various Authors | Heidegger Vs Various Authors | I 186 HeideggerVsCatholicism: (against the re-admission of a Catholic student fraternity): "one still does not know the Catholic tactic. And one day this will severely take revenge". Habermas Seyn: spelling in late work, Vs traditional ontology. I 123 HeideggerVsHerder: there is no general language. >Language/Foucault, Language/Davidson. HeideggerVsPhilosophy: Vs Division into individual areas and thus scientification. I 171 Subject/Object: HeideggerVs this traditional, space-creating differentiation. Instead: "Walten sui generis". VsDichotomies: Truth/Untruth, - Theory/Practice - Freedom/Necessity - Belief/Wisdom - Divine/Human - Vs Categories constituting totality: Being as substance, happening as consciousness, God as prima causa, will as thing in itself (VsSchopenhauer). II 36 HeideggerVsLogic: "dissolves in the vortex of an original questioning..." II 56 Signs/Heidegger: Vs The becoming predominant of the sign character of the word. This must be destroyed. (>Rorty: Sounds become more important, search for original words: Language/Rorty) . II 66 "Indian thinking": does not need the human. (Heidegger Vs). II 131 HeideggerVs "culture enterprise". But he respectfully speaks of "culture", no contemporary thinker is "big enough" to bring thinking directly and in a shaped form before his cause and thus on his way. (Spiegel Interview with M. Heidegger: R. Augstein,Der Spiegel Nr. 23, 31. 05. 1976). |
Hei III Martin Heidegger Sein und Zeit Tübingen 1993 |
| |||