Find counter arguments by entering NameVs… or …VsName.
The author or concept searched is found in the following 2 entries.
| Disputed term/author/ism | Author |
Entry |
Reference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Behaviorism | Tugendhat | I 204 ~ Behaviorism/Tugendhat: similarity only identifiable by behavior (also for oneself) - does without notions - hence also without similarity. >Behavior, >Equality, >Similarity, >Imagination. Behaviorism: uses no (abstract) concepts. >Abstractness. Introspection: non-sensual notion of similarity, abstract concepts (conceptualism) (BehaviorismVs). >Introspection. VsIntrospection: does not find concepts either, merely postulates them. I 215f Language/Behaviorism/Tugendhat: purpose fundamental, pure signal language, circumstances important (TugendhatVsCircumstances). >Circumstances/Tugendhat. "Conditional rules": Use according to the circumstances. TugendhatVs. Behaviorism: Behaviorism has no place for declarative sentences. >Assertions. |
Tu I E. Tugendhat Vorlesungen zur Einführung in die Sprachanalytische Philosophie Frankfurt 1976 Tu II E. Tugendhat Philosophische Aufsätze Frankfurt 1992 |
| Circumstances | Tugendhat | ~ passim TugendhatVsCircumstances: Circumstances cannot be an explanation, otherwise lie, deception, error would be excluded. I 209ff Circumstances Tugendhat: If they determined the importance, all predicates would be quasi-predicates - not circumstances determine the meaning, but rules of use, namely through function. I 227 Function asks: "how", not "under which circumstances". Cf. >Use theory. I 221 TugendhatVsCircumstances as explanation of meaning (no rule possible) - VsIndicating Definition. If circumstances influenced the meaning, there would only be quasi-predicates. >Ostensive definition, >Definitions, >Predicates. |
Tu I E. Tugendhat Vorlesungen zur Einführung in die Sprachanalytische Philosophie Frankfurt 1976 Tu II E. Tugendhat Philosophische Aufsätze Frankfurt 1992 |
| |||
No results. Please choose an author or concept or try a different keyword-search.