Philosophy Lexicon of Arguments

Paradoxes: are contradictions within formally correct statements or sets of statements that lead to an existence assumption, which initially seemed plausible, to be withdrawn. Paradoxes are not errors, but challenges that may lead to a re-formulation of the prerequisites and assumptions, or to a change in the language, the subject domain, and the logical system. See also Russellian paradox, contradictions, range, consistency.

Annotation: The above characterizations of concepts are neither definitions nor exhausting presentations of problems related to them. Instead, they are intended to give a short introduction to the contributions below. – Lexicon of Arguments.
Author Item    More concepts for author
Barrow, J.D. Paradoxes   Barrow, J.D.
Brandom, Robert Paradoxes   Brandom, Robert
Burge, Tyler Paradoxes   Burge, Tyler
Cantor, G. Paradoxes   Cantor, G.
Cresswell, M.J. Paradoxes   Cresswell, M.J.
Deutsch, David Paradoxes   Deutsch, David
Geach, Peter T. Paradoxes   Geach, Peter T.
Goodman, Nelson Paradoxes   Goodman, Nelson
Kripke, Saul Aaron Paradoxes   Kripke, Saul Aaron
Logic Texts Paradoxes   Logic Texts
Luhmann, Niklas Paradoxes   Luhmann, Niklas
Nozick, Robert Paradoxes   Nozick, Robert
Poincaré, H. Paradoxes   Poincaré, H.
Poundstone, W. Paradoxes   Poundstone, W.
Prior, Arthur Paradoxes   Prior, Arthur
Putnam, Hilary Paradoxes   Putnam, Hilary
Quine, Willard Van Orman Paradoxes   Quine, Willard Van Orman
Ramsey, Frank P. Paradoxes   Ramsey, Frank P.
Rorty, Richard Paradoxes   Rorty, Richard
Russell, Bertrand Paradoxes   Russell, Bertrand
Simpson, E.H. Paradoxes   Simpson, E.H.
Tarski, A. Paradoxes   Tarski, A.
Thiel, Chr. Paradoxes   Thiel, Chr.
Vollmer, Gerhard Paradoxes   Vollmer, Gerhard

Ed. Martin Schulz, access date 2017-06-27