|Method: a method is a procedure agreed on by participants of a discussion or research project. In the case of violations of a method, the comparability of the results is in particular questioned, since these no longer come from a set with uniformly defined properties of the elements._____________Annotation: The above characterizations of concepts are neither definitions nor exhausting presentations of problems related to them. Instead, they are intended to give a short introduction to the contributions below. – Lexicon of Arguments. |
|Wright I 154
Method/Marx/Freud/Wright, G. H.: Marx shows a clear ambivalence between a "causalist", "scientistic" and on the other hand a "hermeneutic-dialectic","teleological" orientation. This ambivalence gives rise to radically different interpretations of his philosophical statements.
In this respect, it is interesting to compare Marx with Freud, whose work often contravenes an explicit, scientifically oriented search for causal explanations with an implicit hermeneutic and teleological tendency of his thinking. Both authors make the impression that their thinking was hindered and distorted to a certain extent by the "Galileoism" prevailing at that time in both science and science theory (positivism). (G. H. von WrightVsFreud.)._____________Explanation of symbols: Roman numerals indicate the source, arabic numerals indicate the page number. The corresponding books are indicated on the right hand side. ((s)…): Comment by the sender of the contribution. The note [Author1]Vs[Author2] or [Author]Vs[term] is an addition from the Dictionary of Arguments. If a German edition is specified, the page numbers refer to this edition.
Das Kapital, Kritik der politische Ökonomie Berlin 1957
Truth and Objectivity, Cambridge 1992
Wahrheit und Objektivität Frankfurt 2001
"Language-Mastery and Sorites Paradox"
Truth and Meaning, G. Evans/J. McDowell, Oxford 1976
Georg Henrik von Wright
Explanation and Understanding, New York 1971
Erklären und Verstehen Hamburg 2008