|Dimension: an entity, about which it can be stated, whether a change has taken place or could take place, for example, a displacement of an object along a single axis. In physics, e.g. degrees of freedom._____________Annotation: The above characterizations of concepts are neither definitions nor exhausting presentations of problems related to them. Instead, they are intended to give a short introduction to the contributions below. – Lexicon of Arguments. |
|Gärdenfors I 33
Dimension/Langacker/Gärdenfors (Langacker 1987, pp. 150-152): Thesis: many domains (abstract and basic ones) are dimensional, but he does not formulate this as a criterion for a domain. He differentiates
(ii) meronomic relations (part-whole relations), e.g. finger-hand-arm-body.
ClausnerVsLangacker/CroftVsLangacker: (Clausner and Croft 1999, p. 6): the semantic relation conceptual domain is actually a part-whole relation (i.e., meronomic).
GärdenforsVsClausner/GärdenforsVsCroft: that is another sense of "dimensional": concepts correspond to regions of dimensional domains. This is not a normal "part-whole relation"._____________Explanation of symbols: Roman numerals indicate the source, arabic numerals indicate the page number. The corresponding books are indicated on the right hand side. ((s)…): Comment by the sender of the contribution. The note [Author1]Vs[Author2] or [Author]Vs[term] is an addition from the Dictionary of Arguments. If a German edition is specified, the page numbers refer to this edition.
Ronald W. Langacker
Foundations of Cognitive Grammar Stanford, CA 1999
The Geometry of Meaning Cambridge 2014