Philosophy Lexicon of Arguments

 
Lexicon, linguistics, philosophy: the dictionary in which the vocabulary of a language is listed stands in contrast to the rules.

_____________
Annotation: The above characterizations of concepts are neither definitions nor exhausting presentations of problems related to them. Instead, they are intended to give a short introduction to the contributions below. – Lexicon of Arguments.

 
Author Item Excerpt Meta data

 
Books on Amazon:
Peter Gärdenfors
I 119
Lexicon/lexical/meaning/Gärdenfors: the distinction between encyclopaedic and lexical components of meaning is highly controversial. (See Langacker 1987, p 154, 2008, pp 38-39).
Langacker: Thesis: the prominent features belong to the lexical, the less important to the encyclopaedic part of the meaning.
Gärdenfors: there are gradations: for example, that a cat purrs: to which part of the meaning does it belong?


_____________
Explanation of symbols: Roman numerals indicate the source, arabic numerals indicate the page number. The corresponding books are indicated on the right hand side. ((s)…): Comment by the sender of the contribution.

Gä I
P. Gärdenfors
The Geometry of Meaning Cambridge 2014


> Counter arguments against Gärdenfors

Authors A   B   C   D   E   F   G   H   I   J   K   L   M   N   O   P   Q   R   S   T   U   V   W   Z  


Concepts A   B   C   D   E   F   G   H   I   J   K   L   M   N   O   P   Q   R   S   T   U   V   W   Z  



> Suggest your own contribution | > Suggest a correction | > Export as BibTeX Datei
 
Ed. Martin Schulz, access date 2017-09-24