Philosophy Lexicon of Arguments

 
Fixed point: a point that satisfies the equation f (x) = x is a fixed point i.e. x is mapped to itself. S.A. Kripke based his alternative theory of truth from 1975 on fixed points in order to resolve the problem of paradoxes when dealing with self-reference. (Kripke, S., 1975. Outline of a Theory of Truth, The Journal of Philosophy, 72 690-716.). See also self-reference, paradoxes, liar paradox, truth theory.

_____________
Annotation: The above characterizations of concepts are neither definitions nor exhausting presentations of problems related to them. Instead, they are intended to give a short introduction to the contributions below. – Lexicon of Arguments.

 
Author Item Excerpt Meta data

 
Books on Amazon:
Peter Gärdenfors
I 97
Fixed point/communication/Gärdenfors: a fixed point in a communication is reached when, for example, a person sees that the other person looks in the direction of the object they are referring to.
---
I 99
There should also be a consistency between the mental representations for the consistency of word meanings. Communication is also possible without this: e.g. children often have fewer domains in the representation of their terms or the domains are differently weighted.
Equilibrium: Communication can work restrictedly before the equilibrium of the partners (the same level of information) is reached.
---
I 100
Signal game/Jäger/Rooij/Gärdenfors: (Jäger & van Rooij, 2007): randomly selected color samples are ordered by a second person. The goal of the game is to achieve an equal division of the color space in regions. (Nash-equilibrium or fixed point).
Gärdenfors: thesis: this is achieved if the conceptual spaces are convex and compact.
---
I 101
Equilibrium/Fixed point/Gärdenfors: further experiments have shown that repeated interactions lead to a stable communication system. (E.g. Hurford, 1999, Kriby, 1999, Steels, 1999, Kaplan, 2000, Steels & Belpaeme, 2005).
---
I 102
Meanings: do not necessarily have to change when the composition of the communicators involved changes or new parties join or disappear.
Fixed point/Dewey/Gärdenfors: (Dewey 1929, p. 178): in order for V to understand A's moves, he must react to the thing from A's standpoint of view. So not I-centered and vice versa. Thus, something is literally made into a common.
---
I 104
Fixed point theorem/Gärdenfors: in order to achieve fixed points, it is not necessary for the conceptual spaces of the participants to be identical, nor that they divide the spaces equally.
----
I 105
We assume that the rooms are convex and compact. The following theorem from Warglien & Gärdenfors (2013) is a consequence of Brouwer's fixed point theorem (Brouwer 1910):
Theorem: every semantic reaction function, which is a continuous mapping of a convex compact set on itself, has at least one fixed point.
That is, there will always be a fixed point representing a Meeting of Minds.
Conceptual spaces: that they are assumed to be convex makes the communication flowing and memory performance efficient.
---
I 106
Gärdenfors: I do not mean that convex spaces are a reliable representation of our world, but that, because they are effective, they will be widespread.
Fixed points: the fixed point approach allows to consider a variety of types of communication such as color determinations and negotiations. The fixed-point theorem guarantees that the consciousness of the participants together (> Meeting of Minds) but it does not show how the semantic reaction function emerges from the communicative interaction.
---
I 109
Fixed Point/Communication/Gärdenfors: how do we know if a fixed point (balance, agreement) has been reached?
---
I 110
If the listener believes to understand, this is not a guarantee for a meeting of minds.


_____________
Explanation of symbols: Roman numerals indicate the source, arabic numerals indicate the page number. The corresponding books are indicated on the right hand side. ((s)…): Comment by the sender of the contribution.

Gä I
P. Gärdenfors
The Geometry of Meaning Cambridge 2014


> Counter arguments against Gärdenfors

Authors A   B   C   D   E   F   G   H   I   J   K   L   M   N   O   P   Q   R   S   T   U   V   W   Z  


Concepts A   B   C   D   E   F   G   H   I   J   K   L   M   N   O   P   Q   R   S   T   U   V   W   Z  



> Suggest your own contribution | > Suggest a correction | > Export as BibTeX Datei
 
Ed. Martin Schulz, access date 2017-09-22