Dictionary of Arguments
| |||
|
| |||
| Author | Item | Summary | Meta data |
|---|---|---|---|
| Cresswell I 184 Anaphora/Kamp/Heim: Thesis: a discourse section can be interpreted as a "long sentence". HintikkaVsKamp: that is unnatural. CresswellVsHintikka: pro Kamp. It is only about a semantic ((s) non-syntactic) point of view. On the surface we have different sentences. Hintikka: Thesis: a theory like that of Kamp/Heim cannot be applied to question-answer games. CresswellVsHintikka: that does work: E.g. (14) Here is a bee in the room. (15) Will it stab me? --- I 185 On a certain level one can consider (14) and (15) as a conjunction._____________Explanation of symbols: Roman numerals indicate the source, arabic numerals indicate the page number. The corresponding books are indicated on the right hand side. ((s)…): Comment by the sender of the contribution. The note [Author1]Vs[Author2] or [Author]Vs[term] is an addition from the Dictionary of Arguments. If a German edition is specified, the page numbers refer to this edition. |
Kamp I Kamp From Discourse to Logic: Introduction to Modeltheoretic Semantics of Natural Language, Formal Logic and Discourse Representation Theory (Studies in Linguistics and Philosophy) Cr I M. J. Cresswell Semantical Essays (Possible worlds and their rivals) Dordrecht Boston 1988 Cr II M. J. Cresswell Structured Meanings Cambridge Mass. 1984 |
||
> Counter arguments against Kamp
Ed. Martin Schulz, access date 2018-12-15