Philosophy Lexicon of Arguments

Search  
 
Author Item Excerpt Meta data

 
Books on Amazon
Cresswell I 184
Anaphora/Kamp/Heim: Thesis: a discourse section can be interpreted as a "long sentence".
HintikkaVsKamp: that is unnatural.
CresswellVsHintikka: pro Kamp. It is only about a semantic ((s) non-syntactic) point of view. On the surface we have different sentences.
Hintikka: Thesis: a theory like that of Kamp/Heim cannot be applied to question-answer games.
CresswellVsHintikka: that does work: E.g.
(14) Here is a bee in the room.
(15) Will it stab me?
---
I 185
On a certain level one can consider (14) and (15) as a conjunction.

Kamp I
Kamp
From Discourse to Logic: Introduction to Modeltheoretic Semantics of Natural Language, Formal Logic and Discourse Representation Theory (Studies in Linguistics and Philosophy)

Cr I
M. J. Cresswell
Semantical Essays (Possible worlds and their rivals) Dordrecht Boston 1988

Cr II
M. J. Cresswell
Structured Meanings Cambridge Mass. 1984


> Counter arguments against Kamp



> Suggest your own contribution | > Suggest a correction | > Export as BibTeX Datei
 
Ed. Martin Schulz, access date 2017-05-28