Philosophy Dictionary of ArgumentsHome
| |||
|
| |||
| Game-theoretical Semantics: game-theoretical semantics does not trace back truth or falsity of sentences, to meanings alone, but to strategies of verification, which are understood as winning strategies. See also situation semantics, possible world semantics, Kripke-Semantics, Montague-Semantics, dialogical logic._____________Annotation: The above characterizations of concepts are neither definitions nor exhausting presentations of problems related to them. Instead, they are intended to give a short introduction to the contributions below. – Lexicon of Arguments. | |||
| Author | Item | Summary | Meta data |
|---|---|---|---|
| Cresswell I 179 Game-theoretical semantics/CresswellVsHintikka: Hintikka and Kulas (1985) have not made any discoveries that would not have been made by Kamp (1983) and Heim (1983) as well. --- I 180 Example: (1) Everyone loves someone. This is about two different ranges. Λ-categorial language: (2) ((s) Everyone is so that someone is so that the former likes the latter, without quantification. > Lambda notation/Cresswell). and (3) <<λy, < everyone, <λx, |
Kamp I Kamp From Discourse to Logic: Introduction to Modeltheoretic Semantics of Natural Language, Formal Logic and Discourse Representation Theory (Studies in Linguistics and Philosophy) Cr I M. J. Cresswell Semantical Essays (Possible worlds and their rivals) Dordrecht Boston 1988 Cr II M. J. Cresswell Structured Meanings Cambridge Mass. 1984 |
||
> Counter arguments against Kamp
> Counter arguments in relation to Game-theoretical Semantics
Ed. Martin Schulz, access date 2021-01-22