Dictionary of Arguments
| |||
|
| |||
| Artificial Consciousness: in the philosophical discussion about artificial consciousness, the question is whether non-living systems can acquire a set of distinctions that allow a “knowledge-how”. This is meant to be an experiencing of qualities, which can lead to novel decisions. In contrast, the (artificial) intelligence in the narrower sense is the ability to solve problems. See also artificial intelligence, strong artificial intelligence, consciousness, self-consciousness, connectionism, qualia, knowledge-how._____________Annotation: The above characterizations of concepts are neither definitions nor exhausting presentations of problems related to them. Instead, they are intended to give a short introduction to the contributions below. – Lexicon of Arguments. | |||
| Author | Item | Summary | Meta data |
|---|---|---|---|
| XIII 144 Artificial Consciousness/Adorno: (Answer to a question from students): Machines can perform the steps of synthesis - reproduction (recollection) and recognition. --- XIII 145 Contrast to the idealistic concept of the "I think", which is attributed to subjects: in a subject, the set of his experiences is not interchangeable with that of another subject. If one were to assume that this would be possible by means of communication in the long run, one would make the notion of egoism an extremely thin and abstract principle. However, the model of cognitive personal consciousness itself is an abstraction. Since Descartes, the ideal of recognition is the causal-mechanical recognition. --- XIII 146 Then one might say that the ideal of the scientific and epistemological subject is the machine. N.B.: then machines, which are difficult to distinguish from the subject, presuppose a logical cognitive subject as a condition, whereas, conversely, this logical cognitive subject does not presuppose the existence of such machines, as it is simply and intelligently evident from history. ((s) Adorno thus establishes a distinction based on genesis against indistinguishability based on characteristics and behaviors)._____________Explanation of symbols: Roman numerals indicate the source, arabic numerals indicate the page number. The corresponding books are indicated on the right hand side. ((s)…): Comment by the sender of the contribution. The note [Author1]Vs[Author2] or [Author]Vs[term] is an addition from the Dictionary of Arguments. If a German edition is specified, the page numbers refer to this edition. |
A I Th. W. Adorno Max Horkheimer Dialektik der Aufklärung Frankfurt 1978 A II Theodor W. Adorno Negative Dialektik Frankfurt/M. 2000 A III Theodor W. Adorno Ästhetische Theorie Frankfurt/M. 1973 A IV Theodor W. Adorno Minima Moralia Frankfurt/M. 2003 A V Theodor W. Adorno Philosophie der neuen Musik Frankfurt/M. 1995 A VI Theodor W. Adorno Gesammelte Schriften, Band 5: Zur Metakritik der Erkenntnistheorie. Drei Studien zu Hegel Frankfurt/M. 1071 A VII Theodor W. Adorno Noten zur Literatur (I - IV) Frankfurt/M. 2002 A VIII Theodor W. Adorno Gesammelte Schriften in 20 Bänden: Band 2: Kierkegaard. Konstruktion des Ästhetischen Frankfurt/M. 2003 A IX Theodor W. Adorno Gesammelte Schriften in 20 Bänden: Band 8: Soziologische Schriften I Frankfurt/M. 2003 A XI Theodor W. Adorno Über Walter Benjamin Frankfurt/M. 1990 A XII Theodor W. Adorno Philosophische Terminologie Bd. 1 Frankfurt/M. 1973 A XIII Theodor W. Adorno Philosophische Terminologie Bd. 2 Frankfurt/M. 1974 |
||
> Counter arguments against Adorno
Ed. Martin Schulz, access date 2018-12-19