Philosophy Lexicon of Arguments

Author Item Excerpt Meta data

Books on Amazon
Bubner I 25
Practise/Plato/Bubner: even he already knows this concept. Here, however, the mere possession of means is mere dynamism: rhetorical power.
Much fortune is no value, because it is not a goal yet. Goals must be set separately.
The confusion of means and goal makes the powerful powerless.
The what-want is an inner, indissoluble relation between action and goal, asymmetry. Due to the structure of the practice, it has already been recognized as "good".
I 34
Practice/Plato: Specialism inaugurates no practice, it must be surpassed.
I 167
Practice/Plato: "to do his own" is his formula for everyone's role in the state, but everyone can do it only in the context of the whole without overlooking the whole.

Explanation of symbols: Roman numerals indicate the source, arabic numerals indicate the page number. The corresponding books are indicated on the right hand side. ((s)…): Comment by the sender of the contribution.

Bu I
R. Bubner
Antike Themen und ihre moderne Verwandlung Frankfurt 1992

> Counter arguments against Plato

> Suggest your own contribution | > Suggest a correction | > Export as BibTeX Datei
Ed. Martin Schulz, access date 2017-08-22