Philosophy Lexicon of Arguments

Kripke's Wittgenstein: Interpretation by Saul A. Kripke of a problem by L. Wittgenstein in connection with the rule series. Kripke extends Wittgenstein's doubts about the security with which we judge our own opinion. If we only believe to follow rules, we do not know for sure what we mean by addition. From a finite series of cases in the past, no certainty about future cases can be gained. The core of the problem is, according to Kripke, that there are no facts that determine the importance of our own beliefs.
Author Item Excerpt Meta data

Books on Amazon
Sch I 160
Kripke s Wittgenstein / SchulteVsKripke: the paradox arises because one could interpret a signpost in virtually any direction. - VsKripke: error to assume that there is an interpretation here at all - instead: training: drawing no conclusions between the seeing of the sign and the reaction - solution: act as part of a practice.

Sch I
J. Schulte
Wittgenstein Stuttgart 2001

Sch II
J. Schulte/U.J. Wenzel
Was ist ein philosophisches Problem? Frankfurt 2001

> Counter arguments in relation to Kripke’s Wittgenstein

> Suggest your own contribution | > Suggest a correction | > Export as BibTeX Datei
Ed. Martin Schulz, access date 2017-05-23