## Philosophy Lexicon of Arguments | |||

Paradoxes: are contradictions within formally correct statements or sets of statements that lead to an existence assumption, which initially seemed plausible, to be withdrawn. Paradoxes are not errors, but challenges that may lead to a re-formulation of the prerequisites and assumptions, or to a change in the language, the subject domain, and the logical system. See also Russellian paradox, contradictions, range, consistency. | |||

Author | Item | Excerpt | Meta data |
---|---|---|---|

Books on Amazon |
Berka I 371 Antinomies/Ramsey: Subdivision: A) Semantic: Liar, Grelling/Nelson, Russellian A. of the designation. B) syntactically (logically): antinomy of Cantor, of Burali Forti, Russell's set of all sets which do not contain themselves as elements. --- I 372 Antinomies/Paradoxes/Solution/Berka: a) Axiomatization, (Fraenkel, v. Neumann, Bernays, Quine) B) (Russell, König, Brouwer, Hilbert): Verification of the logical foundations of set theory and mathematics. > Type theory, > Separation of object and meta language. |
Rams I F. P. Ramsey The Foundations of Mathematics and Other Logical Essays 2013 Brk I K. Berka/L. Kreiser Logik Texte Berlin 1983 |

> Suggest your own contribution | > Suggest a correction | > Export as BibTeX Datei

Ed. Martin Schulz, access date 2017-05-27