Philosophy Dictionary of ArgumentsHome
| |||
|
| |||
| Terminology: This section explains special features of the language used by the individual authors. _____________Annotation: The above characterizations of concepts are neither definitions nor exhausting presentations of problems related to them. Instead, they are intended to give a short introduction to the contributions below. – Lexicon of Arguments. | |||
| Author | Concept | Summary/Quotes | Sources |
|---|---|---|---|
|
Richard Montague on Terminology - Dictionary of Arguments
Cresswell II 70 Sense/Reference/Terminology/Montague/Cresswell: Montague uses sense/reference similar to my use of intension/extension. >Reference, >Intension, >Extension. This is to reconcile both with Frege's approach. >Fregean sense, >Fregean meaning, >G. Frege, >Sense/Frege, >Meaning/Frege, >Reference/Frege. Reference/Terminology/Montague/Cresswell: Montague identifies reference with extension._____________Explanation of symbols: Roman numerals indicate the source, arabic numerals indicate the page number. The corresponding books are indicated on the right hand side. ((s)…): Comment by the sender of the contribution. Translations: Dictionary of Arguments The note [Concept/Author], [Author1]Vs[Author2] or [Author]Vs[term] resp. "problem:"/"solution:", "old:"/"new:" and "thesis:" is an addition from the Dictionary of Arguments. If a German edition is specified, the page numbers refer to this edition. |
Cr I M. J. Cresswell Semantical Essays (Possible worlds and their rivals) Dordrecht Boston 1988 Cr II M. J. Cresswell Structured Meanings Cambridge Mass. 1984 |
||
> Counter arguments against Montague
> Counter arguments in relation to Terminology
Ed. Martin Schulz, access date 2024-04-23