Philosophy Lexicon of Arguments

Screenshot Tabelle Begriffe

Author Item Summary Meta data

Books on Amazon

I 315
Legality/Identification/Identifiability/Individuation/Law/legal/Millikan: Properties are identifiable only because they are involved in legal procedures.
Substances: are only identifiable because they have properties.
Concept/Test/Millikan: is it necessary to make inferences of sentences in which tokens of concepts occur, in order to test the theory?
Knowledge: we need knowledge about the use of concepts in actions, not in conclusions. And that would be impossible if the facts did not occur in laws.
N.B.: But it does not follow that we need to know these laws at all. For example, to distinguish between red and green, we need to know no law of optics. I could do it anyway before I learned any law.
I 316
Conviction/belief/Millikan: I can also develop beliefs about objects without having developed any theories about the entities of which the concepts are about in my beliefs.

Explanation of symbols: Roman numerals indicate the source, arabic numerals indicate the page number. The corresponding books are indicated on the right hand side. ((s)…): Comment by the sender of the contribution.

Millk I
R. G. Millikan
Language, Thought, and Other Biological Categories: New Foundations for Realism Cambridge 1987

Send Link
> Counter arguments against Millikan

Authors A   B   C   D   E   F   G   H   I   J   K   L   M   N   P   Q   R   S   T   U   V   W   Z  

Concepts A   B   C   D   E   F   G   H   I   J   K   L   M   N   O   P   Q   R   S   T   U   V   W   Z  

> Suggest your own contribution | > Suggest a correction | > Export as BibTeX Datei
Ed. Martin Schulz, access date 2018-04-25