|Definition: determination of the use of linguistic signs (words, symbols, connectives) for non-linguistic or linguistic objects. New definitions are not supposed to be creative, that is, they are to be derived from the use of the signs already employed. See also definability, conservativity, systems, theories, models, reference systems, context definition, explicit defnition, implicit definition._____________Annotation: The above characterizations of concepts are neither definitions nor exhausting presentations of problems related to them. Instead, they are intended to give a short introduction to the contributions below. – Lexicon of Arguments. |
|Holz I 38
Definition/Leibniz: the number of definitions is just as infinite as the number of terms and the axioms.
The definition always has the form of an identical sentence A = B. i.e. the predicate is identical with the subject.
One page can always be set for the other.
Substitution: Leibniz calls this interchangeability "making an insight through the consequences".
This is beside the proof of reason. Both must come together._____________Explanation of symbols: Roman numerals indicate the source, arabic numerals indicate the page number. The corresponding books are indicated on the right hand side. ((s)…): Comment by the sender of the contribution. The note [Author1]Vs[Author2] or [Author]Vs[term] is an addition from the Dictionary of Arguments. If a German edition is specified, the page numbers refer to this edition.
G. W. Leibniz
Philosophical Texts (Oxford Philosophical Texts) Oxford 1998
Hans Heinz Holz
Descartes Frankfurt/M. 1994
H. H. Holz
Leibniz Frankfurt 1992