Philosophy Lexicon of Arguments

Search  
 
Metaphysics: is a theory that has the claim to ask questions and provide answers beyond our available knowledge. It is objected that even for asking questions, a knowledge of the meanings of the words used is required. This knowledge is not given when experiences or at least theories using these terms are not available. See also essentialism, metaphysical possibility.

_____________
Annotation: The above characterizations of concepts are neither definitions nor exhausting presentations of problems related to them. Instead, they are intended to give a short introduction to the contributions below. – Lexicon of Arguments.

 
Author Item Excerpt Meta data

 
Books on Amazon
Diaz-Bone I 50
Metaphysics/James: James is pro metaphysics in the sense of a kind of meta-science, their objects are the results of different disciplines. > Hodgson: Reflection as a search for the means of philosophizing, without relying on assumptions and concepts, "reflection".
---
I 63/64
Metaphysics/James: while James fights strongly against the "absolutist metaphysics of a Hegel, he accepts an "antidualist metaphysics": the difference between subject/object is dissolved in pure experience.


_____________
Explanation of symbols: Roman numerals indicate the source, arabic numerals indicate the page number. The corresponding books are indicated on the right hand side. ((s)…): Comment by the sender of the contribution.

James I
R. Diaz-Bone/K. Schubert
William James zur Einführung Hamburg 1996


> Counter arguments against James
> Counter arguments in relation to Metaphysics



> Suggest your own contribution | > Suggest a correction | > Export as BibTeX Datei
 
Ed. Martin Schulz, access date 2017-08-16