Philosophy Lexicon of Arguments
| |||
|
| |||
| Terminologies: here, special features of the language use of the individual authors are explained._____________Annotation: The above characterizations of concepts are neither definitions nor exhausting presentations of problems related to them. Instead, they are intended to give a short introduction to the contributions below. – Lexicon of Arguments. | |||
| Author | Item | Summary | Meta data |
|---|---|---|---|
Books on Amazon | Lewis V 153 Definition robust/Jackson/Lewis: A is robust in relation to B, (with respect to one's subjective probability at a time) iff. the probability of A and the probability of A conditional to B are close to each other, and both are high,... --- V 154 ...so if one learns that B, still considers A probable. Jackson: the weaker can then be more robust in terms of something that you think is more unlikely but still do not want to ignore._____________Explanation of symbols: Roman numerals indicate the source, arabic numerals indicate the page number. The corresponding books are indicated on the right hand side. ((s)…): Comment by the sender of the contribution. |
Jack I F. C. Jackson From Metaphysics to Ethics: A Defence of Conceptual Analysis Oxford 2000 LewisCl Clarence Irving Lewis Collected Papers of Clarence Irving Lewis Stanford 1970 LW I David K. Lewis Die Identität von Körper und Geist Frankfurt 1989 LW II David K. Lewis Konventionen Berlin 1975 LW IV David K. Lewis Philosophical Papers Bd I New York Oxford 1983 LW V David K. Lewis Philosophical Papers Bd II New York Oxford 1986 LwCl I Clarence Irving Lewis Mind and the World Order: Outline of a Theory of Knowledge (Dover Books on Western Philosophy) 1991 |
|
> Counter arguments against Jackson
> Suggest your own contribution | > Suggest a correction | > Export as BibTeX Datei
Ed. Martin Schulz, access date 2018-04-26