Philosophy Lexicon of Arguments

Screenshot Tabelle Begriffe

 
Author Item Summary Meta data

 
Books on Amazon
II 303
Uniformity/Hume: we assume a uniformity of past and future.
Physics/Theory/Explanation/Genz: but we assume more than mere uniformity when we explain why.
Physics also hopes for a certain outcome of experiments that have never been conducted before. Merely uniformity is not enough.
Expectation/Genz: is justified by an understanding of the past. It is better than regularity. Therefore, there is no "problem of induction".
---
II 304
Induction/GenzVsPopper: there is no "problem of induction". Understanding is the solution rather than the acceptance of regularities.
Principle/Genz: the disguised reality of the laws of nature is such that we can understand it by principles.


_____________
Explanation of symbols: Roman numerals indicate the source, arabic numerals indicate the page number. The corresponding books are indicated on the right hand side. ((s)…): Comment by the sender of the contribution.

Gz I
H. Genz
Gedankenexperimente Weinheim 1999

Gz II
Henning Genz
Wie die Naturgesetze Wirklichkeit schaffen. Über Physik und Realität München 2002


Send Link
> Counter arguments against Genz
> Counter arguments in relation to Induction

Authors A   B   C   D   E   F   G   H   I   J   K   L   M   N   O   P   Q   R   S   T   U   V   W   Z  


Concepts A   B   C   D   E   F   G   H   I   J   K   L   M   N   O   P   Q   R   S   T   U   V   W   Z  



> Suggest your own contribution | > Suggest a correction | > Export as BibTeX Datei
 
Ed. Martin Schulz, access date 2017-11-22