Philosophy Lexicon of Arguments

Author Item Excerpt Meta data

Books on Amazon
II, 115ff
Sentence/Foucault: does one not have to admit an equivalence between sentence and statement? One can cite statements that do not correspond to the linguistic structure of sentences: E.g. amo amas, amat. This is the statement of the different inflections of a verb. Other e.g. classificatory table, family tree, account book, commercial balance, mathematical equation, growth rough, age pyramid these are all statements. Where are the sentences? They can only be comments here.

Fouc I
M. Foucault
The Order of Things: An Archaeology of Human Sciences 1994

Fouc II
Michel Foucault
Archäologie des Wissens Frankfurt/M. 1981

> Counter arguments against Foucault

> Suggest your own contribution | > Suggest a correction | > Export as BibTeX Datei
Ed. Martin Schulz, access date 2017-05-25