Philosophy Lexicon of Arguments

Proof in logic, mathematics: finite string of symbols, which derives a statement in a system from the axioms of the system together with already proven statements.

Annotation: The above characterizations of concepts are neither definitions nor exhausting presentations of problems related to them. Instead, they are intended to give a short introduction to the contributions below. – Lexicon of Arguments.
Author Item Excerpt Meta data

Books on Amazon:
David Chalmers
Proof/Argument/Chalmers: to argue against something, one can proceed on three levels:
1. The Unimaginability
2. The lack of recognizability (epistemic)
3. The conceptual analysis.
For the irreducibility of conscious experience, I will argue on all three levels.
This will be about an a priori version of the logical necessity with regard to primary intensions.

Explanation of symbols: Roman numerals indicate the source, arabic numerals indicate the page number. The corresponding books are indicated on the right hand side. ((s)…): Comment by the sender of the contribution.

Cha I
The Conscious Mind Oxford New York 1996

Cha II
D. Chalmers
Constructing the World Oxford 2014

> Counter arguments against Chalmers

> Suggest your own contribution | > Suggest a correction | > Export as BibTeX Datei
Ed. Martin Schulz, access date 2017-06-28