Philosophy Lexicon of Arguments

Author Item Excerpt Meta data

Books on Amazon
Cavell II St. Cavell Müssen wir meinen was wir sagen? aus Grewendorf/Meggle Linguistik und Phil. Frankfurt (Athenäum) 1974/1995

II 181
Communication/Language/Cavell: not everything could be said explicitly otherwise communication could only be acoustically destroyed.
We are therefore responsible for the implications as well as for the explicitly stated.
The fact that the implications of an utterance are appropriate can no longer be ensured by a general procedure, as can be determined by whether all that is said is true. ("Everything he said").

Explanation of symbols: Roman numerals indicate the source, arabic numerals indicate the page number. The corresponding books are indicated on the right hand side. ((s)…): Comment by the sender of the contribution.

Cav I
St. Cavell
Die Unheimlichkeit des Gewöhnlichen Frankfurt 2002

> Counter arguments against Cavell
> Counter arguments in relation to Communication

> Suggest your own contribution | > Suggest a correction | > Export as BibTeX Datei
Ed. Martin Schulz, access date 2017-07-23