Philosophy Lexicon of Arguments

Search  
 
Author Item Excerpt Meta data

 
Books on Amazon
Fodor IV 236
Note
10.> 235 ~ 6
Brentano: his thesis (the intentional cannot be reduced to neurophysiology) does not imply that there can be no intentional laws. It only tells us that if there are any, they must be irreducible.
---
11.
If they exist, they must surely be ceteris paribus laws. These are special laws in science in general.


_____________
Explanation of symbols: Roman numerals indicate the source, arabic numerals indicate the page number. The corresponding books are indicated on the right hand side. ((s)…): Comment by the sender of the contribution.

Brent I
F. Brentano
Psychology from An Empirical Standpoint (Routledge Classics) London 2014

F/L
J. Fodor/E. Lepore
Holism Cambridge USA Oxford UK 1992


> Counter arguments against Brentano
> Counter arguments in relation to Laws



> Suggest your own contribution | > Suggest a correction | > Export as BibTeX Datei
 
Ed. Martin Schulz, access date 2017-08-22