|Names, proper names, philosophy: the status of proper names is a relatively new philosophical problem. S. A. Kripke has treated it as one of the first in “Naming and Necessity” (three lectures at Princeton University 1970, reprint Cambridge, 1980). Against the traditional bundle theory, according to which the meaning of names lies in the properties, or at least in the essential properties of their bearers, Kripke develops a causal theory of the names, which ultimately goes back to a baptism in the broader sense. The decisive point is that the name is associated with the person but it is not required that the person has any additional properties. See also causal theory, possible worlds, rigidity, rigid designators, descriptions.|
Books on Amazon
|Frank I 101
Names/Ostension/Russell/Anscombe: here there are two things to be understood: the kind of use and what they are to be applied to from time to time.
I/Anscombe: for "I" there is only the use!
I/Ambrose Bierce: ("Devil's Dictionary"): ... the idea of two that are I is difficult, but subtle.
M. Frank (Hrsg.)
Analytische Theorien des Selbstbewusstseins Frankfurt 1994