Philosophy Lexicon of Arguments

Search  
 
Author Item Excerpt Meta data

 
Books on Amazon
Rorty VI 219
Research/Standards/McDowell: it is just the wit of the standards of research, that their compliance increases the probability to get closer to the the world as it is, the "suchness"!
RortyVsMcDowell: again leading to a false distinction of scheme and world. McDowell, who accepts Davidson's critique of the differentiation scheme/content, denies this.
James would ask: what difference in behavior would it make?

MD I
J. McDowell
Geist und Welt Frankfurt 2001

Ro I
R. Rorty
Der Spiegel der Natur Frankfurt 1997

Ro II
R. Rorty
Philosophie & die Zukunft Frankfurt 2000

Ro III
R. Rorty
Kontingenz, Ironie und Solidarität Frankfurt 1992

Ro IV
R. Rorty
Eine Kultur ohne Zentrum Stuttgart 1993

Ro V
R. Rorty
Solidarität oder Objektivität? Stuttgart 1998

Ro VI
R. Rorty
Wahrheit und Fortschritt Frankfurt 2000


> Counter arguments against McDowell
> Counter arguments in relation to Science



> Suggest your own contribution | > Suggest a correction | > Export as BibTeX Datei
 
Ed. Martin Schulz, access date 2017-05-24