Philosophy Lexicon of Arguments

Author Item Excerpt Meta data

Books on Amazon
I 630
Definition recurrence/Brandom: the same singular term, not only the same type - requires consistency for repetition: this is the intra-term or de jure equivalence.
I 634
Recurrence structures can be equivalence classes of term tokenings of a single lexical type (Connects Franklin with the inventor of the bifocals).
I 631
Repetition/Token recurrence/TR/Brandom: Two types of substitutional equivalence: 1) token recurrence requires consistency in representation: "Intra-term or de jure equivalence" (binding for all) - 2) the changes that leave the appropriate other unchanged are the inter-term equivalences (varies with doxastic repertoires).
I 953
If inheritance is kept consistent, the first SMSICs would have had to be different E.g. if Oswald did not shoot Kennedy, then someone else did it - otherwise: E.g. "If Oswald did not shoot Kennedy, someone else would have done it".

Explanation of symbols: Roman numerals indicate the source, arabic numerals indicate the page number. The corresponding books are indicated on the right hand side. ((s)…): Comment by the sender of the contribution.

Bra I
R. Brandom
Expressive Vernunft Frankfurt 2000

Bra II
R. Brandom
Begründen und Begreifen Frankfurt 2001

> Counter arguments against Brandom

> Suggest your own contribution | > Suggest a correction | > Export as BibTeX Datei
Ed. Martin Schulz, access date 2017-06-27