Philosophy Lexicon of Arguments

Screenshot Tabelle Begriffe

 
Repetition: procedures or processes that are described in a certain way, but not objects, can be repeated. In order for the repeatability of a process to be ascertained, its description must emphasize and particularly evaluate certain properties of the objects involved against other properties of the same objects. Whether history is repeated is the subject of controversy. See also forgery, copy, history.

_____________
Annotation: The above characterizations of concepts are neither definitions nor exhausting presentations of problems related to them. Instead, they are intended to give a short introduction to the contributions below. – Lexicon of Arguments.

 
Author Item Summary Meta data

 
Books on Amazon
I 630
Definition recurrence/Brandom: the same singular term, not only the same type - requires consistency for repetition: this is the intra-term or de jure equivalence.
---
I 634
Recurrence structures can be equivalence classes of term tokenings of a single lexical type (Connects Franklin with the inventor of the bifocals).
---
I 631
Repetition/Token recurrence/TR/Brandom: Two types of substitutional equivalence: 1) token recurrence requires consistency in representation: "Intra-term or de jure equivalence" (binding for all) - 2) the changes that leave the appropriate other unchanged are the inter-term equivalences (varies with doxastic repertoires).
---
I 953
If inheritance is kept consistent, the first SMSICs would have had to be different E.g. if Oswald did not shoot Kennedy, then someone else did it - otherwise: E.g. "If Oswald did not shoot Kennedy, someone else would have done it".


_____________
Explanation of symbols: Roman numerals indicate the source, arabic numerals indicate the page number. The corresponding books are indicated on the right hand side. ((s)…): Comment by the sender of the contribution.

Bra I
R. Brandom
Expressive Vernunft Frankfurt 2000

Bra II
R. Brandom
Begründen und Begreifen Frankfurt 2001


Send Link
> Counter arguments against Brandom

Authors A   B   C   D   E   F   G   H   I   J   K   L   M   N   O   P   Q   R   S   T   U   V   W   Z  


Concepts A   B   C   D   E   F   G   H   I   J   K   L   M   N   O   P   Q   R   S   T   U   V   W   Z  



> Suggest your own contribution | > Suggest a correction | > Export as BibTeX Datei
 
Ed. Martin Schulz, access date 2017-11-23