Philosophy Lexicon of Arguments

Author Item Excerpt Meta data

Books on Amazon
I 628
Recognition/Repeatability/Brandom: repeatable events are lexical types. But cotypicity is neither necessary nor sufficient, so they are considered as occurrences of the same semantic meaning. Not sufficiently, because the substitution inference is not guaranteed here: not necessary: because the relation between predicates already guarantees the accuracy - e.g. this organism is a mammal, so it is a vertebrate (anaphora) - required: recognition (reidentifiability)

Explanation of symbols: Roman numerals indicate the source, arabic numerals indicate the page number. The corresponding books are indicated on the right hand side. ((s)…): Comment by the sender of the contribution.

Bra I
R. Brandom
Expressive Vernunft Frankfurt 2000

Bra II
R. Brandom
Begründen und Begreifen Frankfurt 2001

> Counter arguments against Brandom

> Suggest your own contribution | > Suggest a correction | > Export as BibTeX Datei
Ed. Martin Schulz, access date 2017-06-27