|Essence, philosophy: the essence of an object is understood to mean one or more properties without which the object is inconceivable. Critics argue that such necessary properties can only be attributed to concepts, but not to empirical objects. See also features, essentialism, ultimate justification, properties, metaphysics, concepts, necessity de re, substance._____________Annotation: The above characterizations of concepts are neither definitions nor exhausting presentations of problems related to them. Instead, they are intended to give a short introduction to the contributions below. – Lexicon of Arguments. |
Books on Amazon
Essential/Simons: what exists, exists essentially. - But it does not exist necessarily - Solution: Assuming that E.g. whatever is a human, must be a human. - (S)but an aardvark could have gotten the name Kripke. - Essential/Simons: = -"relatively necessary"- It is essential for Cicero that he exists. - Necessary/Wiggins: should distinguish these cases.
Trivial essential/Simons: E.g. to be colored if red, e.g. to be self-identical, e.g. to exist, E.g. -"to be like that 2 + 2 = 4" - essential attributes: are no -"mere facts" ("brute fact"), but an object has them by virtue of the fact that it belongs to a certain type. - It is not accidental for an object of a given type, that it has the characteristics which underlie the type.
Normal/essential/middle course/Simons: -"normal part of a normal thing of a type" - middle course between simple and essential part. - often forgotten by philosophers. - (S) takes type as the fundamental concept. - But no formal theory. - Normality: perhaps starting from wellformedness . - Woltersdorff: E.g. music piece, performance. - SimonsVs: does not work because of transitivity of identity. - Solution/(s): Type._____________Explanation of symbols: Roman numerals indicate the source, arabic numerals indicate the page number. The corresponding books are indicated on the right hand side. ((s)…): Comment by the sender of the contribution.
Parts Oxford New York 1987