Philosophy Lexicon of Arguments

Author Item Excerpt Meta data

Books on Amazon
I 276
Essence/nature/Dennett: Nothing that is so complicated that it is interesting can have an essence. (s) Reason: if it consists of several parts, it can only have developed gradually, while discarding useless parts. Therefore, it was not essential at any time. Of course, not even at the present time.
I 569
DennettVsEssentialism: E.g. has the vending machine dissolved into nothingness. Similarly: E.g. Frog: would have tried to catch food pellets in the wild just the same if they had crossed his path.
Disjunction: in some ways "fly or pellets" is a natural type of frogs. They do not naturally make a distinction between the two of them.
On the other hand, disjunction is not a natural type: it does not occur in nature.

Explanation of symbols: Roman numerals indicate the source, arabic numerals indicate the page number. The corresponding books are indicated on the right hand side. ((s)…): Comment by the sender of the contribution.

Den I
D. Dennett
Darwins gefährliches Erbe Hamburg 1997

Den II
D. Dennett
Spielarten des Geistes Gütersloh 1999

> Counter arguments against Dennett

> Suggest your own contribution | > Suggest a correction | > Export as BibTeX Datei
Ed. Martin Schulz, access date 2017-06-24